cbd oil for vocal cord dysfunction

8 Ways Musicians Can Benefit From CBD Oil

Musicians and performers can benefit from CBD oil, which is available online, in a variety of ways. Because it helps treat anxiety and is anti-inflammatory, musicians may find themselves in greater health and mental condition when they use CBD oil, though it’s important to remember the dosage for CBD oil varies from person to person.

Because the dose varies on a number of factors, such as age, gender, and condition you’re aiming to treat, it’s important to start small and work your way up until you achieve the desired effect.

1. Address Performance Anxiety

In the first UK academic study on mental health and musicians, Help Musicians UK (a British non-profit) found that 71% of them experienced performance anxiety, anxiety/panic attacks. Performing on stage is a high-pressure situation, so it’s no real surprise the body’s “fight or flight” response could kick in and create issues.

In a small scale Brazilian study , participants either received oral CBD or a placebo 90 minutes before they underwent a simulated public speaking test. The researchers found a 300-milligram dose of CBD was the most effective at reducing anxiety during the trial. Placebo, a 150-milligram dose, and a 600-milligram dose had little to no effect on anxiety, suggesting that more isn’t always better, which is why it’s important to adjust doses gradually.

A new study is underway in the United States. It is an 8-week double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial that started in July 2019. Preclinical evidence conclusively demonstrates efficacy in reducing anxiety behaviors relevant to multiple disorders. The study is expected to be completed in October 2020.

2. Keep Vocal Cords Healthy

CBD acts as an anti-inflammatory, which can help keep the vocal cords in good shape after a show.

Inflammation is a side effect of prolonged strain to the vocal cords, and while there are medications available to address this, they have side effects such as thinning the blood. Thinner blood contributes to the possibility of vocal cord rupture.

3. Keep Skin Clear

The anti-inflammatory effects of CBD can also help combat acne, which can be an issue for musicians who deal with a lot of stage makeup. A test-tube study found that CBD oil prevented the skin’s sebaceous glands from excreting too much sebum, and simultaneously preventing the activation of cytokines that are known to promote acne.

4. Fights Depression

Depression is common among performers, with artists like Chester Bennington of Linkin Park and Chris Cornell of Soundgarden among the many who’ve committed suicide. It’s so common, in fact, the same study by Help Musicians found that 60% of musicians had struggled with mental health, 68% say they struggled with separation from family and friends and loneliness.

When correlated to reports on the general population in the UK, musicians could be up to three times more likely to suffer from depression as the general public.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), depression is the single most significant contributor to disability worldwide. Generally, depression is treated with drugs that cause a plethora of side effects such as headache, drowsiness, insomnia, agitation, and sexual dysfunction.

Certain classes of medications, such as benzodiazepines (Xanax, Klonopin, Valium, and Ativan, to name a few) have a high potential for addiction, which can lead to substance abuse.

Multiple animal studies have shown the best CBD oil has antidepressant-like effects, suggesting that CBD can act on the brain’s serotonin receptors. Serotonin is a neurotransmitter that regulates social behavior and mood.

5. Helps with Substance Abuse Issues

Many musicians turn to drugs and alcohol to help them cope with the pressures of celebrity life, touring, recording, and so on. CBD has been shown in animal studies to change brain circuitry as related to addiction. One study found it reduced heroin seeking behavior as well as morphine dependence.

But it’s not just hard drugs that CBD can help you break away from. A 2010 article that examined alcoholism and the endocannabinoid system found that prolonged alcohol exposure causes deficits in the brain’s endocannabinoid signaling.

This can contribute to maladaptive stress coping and an increased desire for alcohol consumption, in an attempt to boost CB1 receptor activity, creating a vicious cycle of addiction that feeds on itself. Because long term alcohol abuse depletes endocannabinoid tone and the endocannabinoid system is involved with dopamine and serotonin, it creates issues with mood regulation and impulsive behavior.

6. Boost Creativity

Not something you hear about often when discussing the benefits of CBD oil, the truth is using it may make you more creative. Studies show that using CBD increases the blood flow to your frontal lobe. Increased blood flow to this region has also been found in people who are when compared to those with low creativity, highly creative. The frontal lobe is responsible for creativity, problem-solving, and planning, so activities that engage it are among the most creative pursuits.

Using CBD to get this increased blood flow allows the brain to operate more efficiently and flexibly.

7. Improve Energy Levels

Because CBD oil can affect serotonin levels, CBD can work to improve mood and energy. Serotonin is a neurotransmitter that’s involved in a number of functions throughout the body.

It is sometimes called the Happy Chemical because it plays such an important role in well-being and happiness. But beyond mood regulation, serotonin also plays a role in appetite, along with motor and cognitive function.

8. Provide Pain Relief

CBD for pain relief is one of the most common uses. Musicians are often on stage dancing and singing for hours at a time, which can be hard on the legs and feet. For musicians who are also playing instruments like the guitar while singing, it’s also stressful on the arms, hands, and fingers.

According to a meta-analysis of various reports and studies, there is substantial evidence that cannabis is an effective chronic treatment in adults. A separate study published in the Journal of Experimental Medicine supports these results suggesting that using CBD decreases pain and inflammation.

Researchers found that test subjects were not likely to build a tolerance to the CBD effects, so they would not have to increase their dose regularly to achieve pain relief. Based on this research experts from Organic CBD Nugs noted that CBD and other cannabinoids could provide helpful new treatments for people living with chronic pain.

If you’re a musician who’s not already using CBD oil as part of your lifestyle, it may be time to consider it. However, because CBD has the potential to interact with certain prescription medications, it’s always best to speak to a medical professional before you start using it.

Metal Insider occasionally accepts paid content. Check here to find out more about our advertising policy.

Cannabis related side effects in otolaryngology: a scoping review

Cannabis has been rapidly legalized in North America; however, limited evidence exists around its side effects. Health Canada defines side effect as a harmful and unintended response to a health product. Given drug safety concerns, this study’s purpose was to review the unintended side effects of cannabis in otolaryngology.

Methods

The Preferred Reporting Items For Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) protocol was used to conduct a scoping review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases. (PROSPERO: CRD42020153022). English studies in adults were included from inception to the end of 2019. In-vitro, animal, and studies with n < 5 were excluded. Primary outcome was defined as unintended side effects (defined as any Otolaryngology symptom or diagnosis) following cannabis use. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine: Levels of Evidence and risk of bias using the Risk of Bias in randomized trials (RoB 2) and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tools were assessed.. Two authors independently reviewed all studies; the senior author settled any discrepancies.

Results

Five hundred and twenty-one studies were screened; 48 studies were analysed. Subspecialties comprised: Head and Neck (32), Otology (8), Rhinology (5), Airway (5), Laryngology (1). Cannabis use was associated with unintended tinnitus, vertigo, hearing loss, infection, malignancy, sinusitis, allergic rhinitis, thyroid dysfunction, and dyspnea. About half (54.1%) of studies showed increased side effects, or no change in symptoms following cannabis use. Oxford Levels of Evidence was 2–4 with substantial heterogeneity. Risk of bias assessment with RoB2 was low to high and ROBINS-1 was moderate to critical.

Conclusion

This was the first comprehensive scoping review of unintended side effects of cannabis in Otolaryngology. The current literature is limited and lacks high-quality research Future randomized studies are needed to focus on therapeutic effects of cannabis in otolaryngology. Substantial work remains to guide clinicians to suggest safe, evidence-based choices for cannabis use.

Graphic abstract

Introduction

Cannabis is one of the most commonly used drugs in North America. Nearly half of the American population has used cannabis at least once in their lifetime, with approximately 9% being current users [1]. Evolving societal perception has rapidly driven the legalization of cannabis, which has been structured to regulate it’s production and sales, while promoting safe consumption [2]. Legalization has led to a perceived reduction in harm, which has been associated with an increased prevalence of cannabis consumption from 2002 to 2014 [2]. Evidence based research has followed this movement, yet a paucity of data concerning the side effects of this drug remains.

See also  can you use cbd oil for tooth pain

Cannabis is derived from a flowering plant. There are three main forms of cannabis, based on the part of the plant that the drug is produced from: marijuana, hashih, and hash oil [3]. Marijuana is the least potent form and manufactured from the dried flowers and leaves. Hashish is manufactured from the resin or secreted gum of the plant. Hash oil is the most potent and manufactured from the thick oil obtained from hashish [4]. There are three routes of delivery of this drug: oral, dermal, and inhaled. Smoking the drug via the inhaled route is the most popular due to the quick onset of action [4].

Health Canada defines a side effect as “a harmful and unintended response to a health product” [5]. Pharmacists distinguish the term “side effect” from “adverse event” [6]. The latter is an undesired occurrence that results from taking a medication correctly. Side effect occurs when the medication is administered regardless of the dose. Side effect is the more accurate term for this study since the dosage of cannabis was not reliable, especially before its’ legalization. A review from the New England Journal of Medicine reported adverse health effects of cannabis to be as high as 50% [7]. This list included: addiction, abnormal brain development, progression to use of other drugs, schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, chronic bronchitis, and lung cancer. Health Canada recognizes the importance of side effects and encourages the reporting of side effects on their website with a special section for cannabis products [8]. The aforementioned list focused on psychiatry and respirology side effects of cannabis. Acute side effects of cannabis in otolaryngology may include type 1 hypersensitivity reactions, cough, rhinosinusitis, laryngopharyngitis, xerostomia, and altered neurotologic function. Chronic usage may result in periodontal disease, voice changes, impaired regulation of cell cycle, apoptosis, and cellular migration, potentially increasing the risk of head and neck malignancy [9]. Prior reviews have investigated cannabis use concerning Otolaryngology, but have been limited to the oncology and laryngology literature [4, 10]. The purpose of this scoping review wass to understand the safety profile of cannabis and how drug use in adults has the potential for unintended side effects related to otolaryngology pathologies. The intention is to be comprehensive throughout all subspecialties of Otolaryngology, and to provide clinicians with knowledge to help patients to make safe, evidence-based choices around the use of cannabis.

Methods

This scoping review was carried out according to a review protocol that has been published in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO Registration number: CRD42020153022). A systematic review was the initial intention for this study, but the heterogeneity of the literature and lack of high-quality evidence precluded this, and therefore a scoping review was more appropriate. The reporting of this scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items For Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) statement [11]. The quality of the literature was assessed with the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine: Levels of Evidence [12].

Data sources and search strategy

A literature search was performed in electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases of the Cochrane Library from inception through October 1, 2019. The search strategy was developed with assistance from a medical librarian. Search functions were designed to incorporate two subsections by [AND] Boolean operators. Subsections contained MeSH and field-designated search terms for otolaryngology related diseases and for cannabis. A cannabis search hedge was employed to identify both formal and informal terms for cannabis in the literature [13]. Additionally, reference lists from previously published reviews were screened for articles not identified in the initial search. Detailed search strategies are reported in “Appendix A”.

Study selection

All articles identified via the literature search were exported to Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation Ltd., Melbourne, Australia), a systematic review management software. Study selection was independently undertaken by two authors (J.P.& J.H.) with discrepancies being resolved by consensus with the senior author (A.H.). Inclusion criteria included: (1) English language study, (2) adult population (≥ 18 years old), (3) sample size ≥ 5, (4) clinical study, (5) study subjects report use or were exposed to cannabis, and (6) report of otolaryngology related side effects (symptom or diagnosis) following cannabis use that were unintended. Of note, no pediatric studies were included in this scoping review. Most legislation for legal cannabis prohibits consumption in the pediatric population. The exclusion criteria included: (1) in-vitro or animal study and (2) inappropriate study or publication type (e.g. systematic review, literature review, or book chapter). Additionally, side effects involving the lower airways were excluded as this is generally considered outside of the scope of an Otolaryngologist, and primarily managed by Pulmonology Medicine. The areas of wound healing, analgesia and pain were excluded as they are non-specific to the head and neck. Lastly, the purpose of this scoping review was not to evaluate the therapeutic indications of cannabis in otolaryngology, but to evaluate the unintended otolaryngologic side effects of consuming cannabis recreationally or medically.

Main outcome

This study used Health Canada’s definition of side effect [5]. The primary study concept was to examine unintended Otolaryngology related side effects following any level of cannabis exposure. Otolaryngology related side effects were defined as a pathologic diagnosis or symptom commonly treated by an Otolaryngologist.

Data extraction

Data extraction was conducted by a single author (J.P.) and reviewed by a second author (J.H.). Information extracted from each study included: title, first author, year of publication, study design and objectives, characteristics of study participants, intervention(s) and control(s), tobacco use, cannabis consumption and amount (e.g. joint year), primary study outcomes and main findings including otolaryngology related side effects after cannabis exposure.

Evaluation of risk of bias

Risk of bias assessment was conducted independently by two study authors (J.P.& J.H.) using the Risk of Bias in randomized trials (RoB 2) and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tools [14, 15]. The senior author (AH) settled any discrepancies.

Results

Study selection

A study flow diagram is shown in Fig. 1. The comprehensive database search identified 614 articles and 12 additional articles were identified through the hand searching of reference lists. After removal of duplicates, 521 abstracts were screened. Full-text review of 117 articles excluded a further 69 articles. In total, 48 articles met the inclusion criteria and underwent data extraction and analysis.

PRISMA flow diagram for review methodology

Characteristics of included studies

Detailed characteristics of the 48 studies included are described in Table 1. Among the included studies there were: 17 case–control studies, 14 cross-sectional studies, 6 cohort studies, 6 case series, and 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). There was significant heterogeneity in study design, objective, and strength of the evidence reported. Quality of the literature ranged from level two to four, as shown in Table 1. The sample size of participants in the included studies ranged from 5 to 29,195. The amount of cannabis consumption was reported by the majority of studies (33). A total of 12 studies expressed cannabis consumption in joint-years, defined as the number of joints smoked per day, multiplied by the duration in years. This ranged from < 1 to 62.1 joint-years. Studies not expressing cannabis consumption in joint-years either failed to report the amount of cannabis use or instead reported frequency or weight of cannabis consumption. A large proportion of participants in the included studies also reported tobacco use in addition to cannabis consumption, ranging from 0 to 89.1%. All included articles reported on at least one otolaryngology related side effect following cannabis exposure.

Subspecialty synthesis

A wide variety of otolaryngology subspecialties were represented (Fig. 2). Below is a synthesis of the results and highlights of themes, trends, and gaps categorized by subspecialty.

Number of studies reporting the effect of cannabis on the risk of otolaryngology-related side effects

Head and neck

The most studies were published in head and neck (H&N) (n = 32), with the majority evaluating cannabis’ association with H&N malignancy (n = 24) [16,17,18,19,20, 25, 26, 28,29,30, 32, 37, 39, 40, 42, 45, 46, 49, 50, 55, 59,60,61,62]. Eleven studies reported an increased risk of H&N malignancy following cannabis exposure. Conversely, 12 studies reported no change in risk and two studied reported a decreased risk of H&N cancer following cannabis use. In general, cannabis exposure (via smoking) was associated with increased risk of oropharyngeal carcinoma [30, 42, 59], while oral cavity carcinoma risk was unaffected [32, 39, 40, 42]. This effect appeared to be dose dependant in nature, where low-moderate use had a reduced effect on carcinoma development [37, 42], while higher lifetime use associated a greater risk of malignancy [30, 60].

Eight studies described an association between cannabis and H&N infection, for example, human papilloma virus (HPV) and aspergillus [24, 26, 27, 30, 35, 36, 45, 59]. Three studies reported a positive association between HPV and cannabis exposure [24, 30, 59], while three studied reported no association [26, 35, 45]. Four studies identified the effect of cannabis use on thyroid function [21, 34, 41, 47]. One study reported no association [21] and three study showed a significant association [34, 41, 47].

Overall, forming a firm conclusion on the effects of cannabis in H&N may be challenging, as many studies reported opposing findings. For example, Berthiller et al. described no association between cannabis use and the risk of H&N cancer [19]. However, Zhang et al. provided evidence for a strong dose–response pattern between cannabis use and the risk of H&N malignancy, while also reporting a synergistic effect of cannabis use and cigarette smoking on cancer risk [61]. This area was an unresolved knowledge gap in this scoping review.

See also  is cbd oil legal to take for pain in wisconsin

Level of evidence: Mostly 4.

Otology

The second most studied subspeciality area was otology, where eight studies evaluated cannabis’ association with hearing loss (n = 6), vestibular dysfunction (n = 3) and tinnitus (n = 2) [22, 31, 38, 44, 51, 52, 57, 58]. Please note that one study may have addressed several otologic side effects. Exposure to cannabis was also shown to promote changes in the auditory pathway and alter the function of outer hair cells, while chronic use of cannabis at high doses showed significant changes in vestibular function [22, 52, 57, 58]. There were several excellent basic science otology studies, however, they were excluded because the goal was to keep a clinical focus for this review. Four of the eight otology studies were randomized controlled trials, so the level of evidence was highest for this subspecialty area.

Level of Evidence: 2 and 4.

Rhinology

In rhinology, all five studies reported positive association between sinusitis (n = 4) and allergic rhinitis (n = 2) [31, 33, 53, 56, 63]. One rhinology study evaluated both diagnoses [56]. Cannabis smoking was associated with sinusitis in a large retrospective analysis of the US National Survey on Drug Use and Health database (n = 29,195), which was the largest sample size of all the studies in this scoping review [31]. Stokes et al. provided evidence to support cannabis as a clinically relevant aeroallergen on multi-test skin testing [53]. There was the least controversy in this subspecialty area.

Level of Evidence: 3 and 4.

Airway

Five studies reported cannabis and its associations with upper airway issues, including sleep apnea (n = 3) and dyspnea (n = 2) [23, 31, 48, 54, 63]. Four studies described no change in risk following cannabis exposure and one study reported an increased risk. Primary evidence supports cannabinoids as a promising and safe treatment option for OSA [48]. One of the randomized controlled trials also concluded that there was no significant difference in adverse events between patients who were treated with cannabis and placebo [23]. A recent position statement by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, however, recommended against medical cannabis for the treatment of OSA due to unreliable delivery methods and insufficient evidence of effectiveness, tolerability, and safety [64].

Level of Evidence: 2, 3, and mostly 4.

Laryngology

Only one study in laryngology explored the effect of cannabis on the voice [43]. This older study published in 1980 reported that marijuana users did not differ perceptually from non-smokers and cigarette smokers, and objective voice analysis was also similar. Darker vocal folds were seen on laryngoscopy. This subspecialty was the weakest with the largest knowledge gap.

Level of evidence: 4.

Risk of bias assessment

Overall risk of bias for all RCTs was determined to be high, with some concerns in two studies, and low in the remaining three randomized studies (“Appendix B”). Bias in nonrandomized trials was moderate in 21 studies, serious in 12, and critical in 10 studies (“Appendix C”). The major sources of bias among serious and critical studies were due to selection bias, deviations from intended interventions, confounding and inappropriate methods to control for measured confounders. The majority of nonrandomized studies demonstrated appropriate measurement of outcomes and reporting of outcome data.

Discussion

It is evident from this review that the Otolaryngology cannabis literature is limited but evolving. The included reports demonstrate that unintended side effects in otolaryngology cover a large spectrum of physiology and pathology. These included: tinnitus, vertigo, hearing loss, infection, malignancy, sinusitis, allergic rhinitis, thyroid dysfunction, and dyspnea.

A number of challenges were observed in the included studies. Many studies contained small sample sizes with methodological errors, substantial heterogeneity of study types and varied outcome measures. A lack of standardization in the reporting of quantity, method of consumption, and length of time of cannabis use was common. Similar to cigarette smoking, several studies attempted to use pack-years, but this was inconsistent. Standard medical practice depends on patient self-reporting cannabis use, which leads to recall bias in the literature. Other studies inconsistently used measures to quantify the amount of cannabis in their experimental protocol (e.g. weight, puffs, joints). This did not always control for the type of cannabis, which has the potential to alter expected results substantially. The included studies were published over several decades, however an improvement in the quality of papers were seen over time. Five recent studies were RCTs, suggesting that as cannabis gains widespread acceptance, the medical community recognizes the need for robust evidence. Lastly, challenges arise when studying cannabis consumption with concomitant tobacco and alcohol use. The carcinogenic effects of cannabis, when smoked, is certainly another area of relevance. Although these factors were controlled for by some studies, they will remain confounders until their relationship can be explored entirely.

The medical use of cannabis is legal in 33 US states, and since 2012, 11 states have legalized recreational use of the drug [65]. Conservative estimates project legal cannabis sales to reach $30 billion by 2025, driven mainly by increased legalization of the drug across the country [66]. This swift legalization of cannabis and growth of related industry is likely to lead to the assumption among the general public that cannabis has an adequate safety profile, analogous to the perceived safety, and subsequent increase in consumption of alcohol following prohibition in the 1930’s [67, 68]. Anecdotally, cannabis has been used to treat a large variety of conditions ranging from acute pain and psychiatric diagnoses, to chronic inflammatory conditions [69]. However, only three indications have substantial evidence demonstrating cannabis as an effective treatment alternative. These include chronic pain in adults, oral antiemetic therapy in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, and an improvement in patient reported spasticity in multiple sclerosis [70]. Outside of these few indications, there is limited and conflicting evidence to support the effectiveness of cannabis as a primary treatment for most medical conditions. This trend is similarly demonstrated in our review, with a disparity in consistency of the reported side effects. As we learn more about cannabis, we will likely understand that there are many more interactions and side effects associated with varying amounts of use. Many of these effects will likely not be observed for years, when evidence on chronic use begin to emerge. Conversely, there is the possibility for positive uses that remain to be realized. Given this, it would be appropriate for all health practitioners to develop and incorporate a better understanding of this drug into their practice as the literature continues to evolve.

There are obvious gaps in the knowledge of how cannabis affects otolaryngology, but this also suggests extensive opportunities for further research. Every subspecialty of Otolaryngology remains a potential area for further study. Presently, the areas of H&N oncology, otology and allergy demonstrate convincing effects of cannabis, making them easy study prospects. Furthermore, the quantification of cannabis use over time and understanding the potential risks may lead to harm reduction campaigns, notably with young and heavy users.

A small number of recent systematic reviews have studied cannabis in subspecialties within Otolaryngology, such as laryngology and H&N oncology. Meehan-Atrash et al. in [4], assessed the association between inhaled cannabis and voice disorders. Similar to our review, the group only identified a single clinical study specific to voice. De Carvalho et al. in [10] performed a meta-analysis to establish the relationship between marijuana and H&N cancer. This group reported no association between lifetime marijuana use and H&N malignancy. Although these researchers were able to reach a conclusion on H&N cancer risk, the findings of our review have dissuaded us from doing the same as we believe that much of the H&N oncology literature is divided and still in its infancy. Furthermore, de Carvalho et al. (2015) limited their meta-analysis to case–control studies. Considering the cannabis literature has evolved significantly since 2015, we believe that higher-quality studies, including longitudinal studies, are needed to reach a clear consensus. A narrative review on the evidence for the use of cannabis in otolaryngology was recently completed by Valentino and Mckinnon. However, they did not adhere to PRISMA guidelines and perform a scoping review of the literature [9]. They did not use the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence or perform a risk of bias assessment to evaluate the quality of the studies.

The strengths of this scoping review included the rigorous PRISMA methodology, comprehensive peer reviewed search strategy, and the inclusion of a fair number of reports. This was an ideal methodology to study this topic, as scoping reviews are useful for evaluating emerging evidence. Broad areas can be examined to identify knowledge gaps and show how research is currently being conducted in this field, helping to define more precise questions. Recognizing the heterogeneity of the literature, the choice to use a scoping review methodology allowed for data synthesis, hypothesis generation and will serve as a precursor for systematic reviews and future study in this early field. Lastly, this review was the first to group unintended side effects to each subspecialty, and attempt to define a preliminary risk profile of cannabis (i.e. Head and neck malignancy).

See also  do i need a prescription for cbd oil mn

There were some limitations. This review was limited to English language studies only. Case studies with less than five patients were excluded to ensure that only higher-quality studies were included. This decision may have excluded very rare side effects. Furthermore, given the multiple methods of cannabis consumption, the severity and degree of side effects may vary. This will likely be overcome as the Cannabis literature becomes more robust. Basic science studies were excluded to maintain a clinical focus in this review. The study was limited to the adult population because most jurisdictions require a legal age limit to consume cannabis.

Conclusion

This scoping review was undertaken to better understand the safety profile of cannabis and its potential for unintended side effects related to Otolaryngology. Although the quality of evidence in the included reports was lacking, it has provided an overview of the available literature, potential pitfalls or challenges to study design, and was hypothesis-generating. This review indicated that cannabis use is associated with several side effects, including hearing loss, H&N malignancy, and HPV infection. However, much of the H&N literature remains divided on the actual risk of cannabis use. Significant opportunities exist for the otolaryngology community to better investigate the therapeutic effects of cannabis with high-quality studies, particularly on the risk of long-term use and harm reduction. As the rapidly evolving cannabis market continues to grow, clinicians will be expected to guide and counsel patients considering medical or recreational use, and it is essential that they have access to high-quality objective evidence.

Availability of data materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are either included in this published article or are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Cannabis and Singing: What’s the Relationship?

Singing and cannabis have one undeniable thing in common; they both have the ability to make you feel fantastic! However, the connection between the two runs even deeper than that.

In this article, we explore the complex relationship between cannabis and singing. We will also explain the impact of smoking cannabis on your singing voice. Here’s all you need to know.

The Relationship Between Cannabis and Singing

Using cannabis and singing can both bring about a state of euphoria. As it turns out, this isn’t a coincidence since both activities influence the body’s endocannabinoid system (ECS).

The ECS is a combination of cell receptors and chemical compounds called endocannabinoids. The system has a regulatory function within the body and controls mood, memory, appetite, and the reward response.

The cannabinoids in marijuana act on this system since many of them have a similar molecular structure to our endocannabinoids. This allows them to bind with the same receptors and trigger many of the same functions.

For example, THC (the intoxicating component of cannabis) has a similar shape to an endocannabinoid called anandamide. One of anandamide’s functions is improving mood, and it is sometimes nicknamed ‘the bliss molecule.’ THC binds with the same receptors as anandamide, imparting a state of calm or happiness, the typical marijuana high.

The non-intoxicating cannabinoid CBD also affects the ECS, although it does so indirectly. Rather than binding with cannabinoid receptors, CBD appears to increase our levels of natural endocannabinoids. Interestingly, a recent study suggests that singing may work comparably.

Researcher Nicole Stone led the study for Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience in 2018. It involved nine healthy female volunteers who were members of a choir. The research team tested the volunteers’ endocannabinoid levels before and after singing, dancing, cycling, and reading. They also assessed changes in mood, hunger, heart rate, and blood pressure.

After singing, the participants experienced an average 42% increase in anandamide levels. They also had higher levels of two other endocannabinoids, palmitoylethanolamine (PEA) and oleoylethanolamine (OEA). The women also reported improved mood and emotions after singing.

In comparison, cycling and reading increased only OEA levels. Meanwhile, dancing improved the volunteers’ mood but did not affect endocannabinoid release.

The Benefits of Cannabis and Singing

In recent years, research has highlighted the medicinal properties of cannabis. This has led many states to introduce medical marijuana programs allowing legal access to the herb. Some of the most common uses of medical cannabis include:

  • Chronic pain
  • Nausea and vomiting
  • Appetite disorders
  • Muscle spasms
  • Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

Meanwhile, singing may have some significant benefits of its own. Researchers have investigated its efficacy for a variety of conditions, including:

  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD)
  • Depression
  • Anxiety

More evidence is necessary before we make any firm conclusions about the benefits of singing for health. However, it seems likely that it will have some positive effects, not least thanks to its interaction with the ECS.

Is Cannabis Good or Bad for Your Singing Voice?

Although both singing and cannabis have some potential benefits for physical and mental health, there are some drawbacks to consider. The most evident is the fact that many people use marijuana by smoking, a process that could damage the voice.

Smoking anything, either cannabis or tobacco, will harm the throat and lungs. Some sources suggest that smoking marijuana is even more damaging than tobacco since it burns at a higher temperature. Furthermore, people tend to smoke cannabis without a filter, inhale more deeply, and hold the smoke for longer than with cigarettes.

A study by Meehan-Atash and colleagues appeared in JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery in 2019. It found that cannabis smokers had dark vocal folds, as shown by laryngoscopy. It also suggested that marijuana can cause lung and throat injury due to the by-products of smoking.

Some other adverse effects on the voice that cannabis smokers may experience include:

  • Dry throat
  • Hoarseness
  • Low-pitched voice
  • Unclear articulation
  • Altered voice rhythm and fluency

So, are these effects permanent, or is it possible to reverse them by quitting smoking? Let’s take a look.

If I Quit Smoking Cannabis, Will My Voice Improve?

The aforementioned Meehan-Atash study suggests that stopping smoking or switching to a vape can reduce respiratory problems. Although it does not specify the impact of quitting cannabis on the voice, it is highly likely that it will help.

While it is clear that smoking and singing is not an optimal combination, we know less about the impact of vaping.

A 2018 study by Tuhanioglu and colleagues for the Journal of Voice suggests that the effects of vaping may be milder than smoking. However, the long-term effects of vaping on lung health are still unknown.

Therefore, singers may be keen to find another method of consuming cannabis. Fortunately, there are now many different options available.

How to Use Cannabis Without Damaging Your Voice

Since cannabis legalization began sweeping across the states, people have been coming up with ingenious ways to use the herb. Now, the days when the only options were to roll a joint or load a bowl are long gone.

One ever-popular consumption method is cannabis edibles. They allow people to enjoy all the benefits of marijuana without putting a strain on the vocal cords or lungs.

Furthermore, edibles are highly versatile, with options available to suit every taste. Some companies are even selling cannabis or CBD-infused lozenges. These are a great way to use marijuana while also soothing the throat.

Another more modern, but highly effective, way of using cannabis is dabbing concentrates. Although this method still involves inhalation, concentrates like wax and shatter are much purer than cannabis flower. This means that they have less of a negative impact on the throat and lungs.

Other options include oils, tinctures, topical creams, and patches. Our article on how to use cannabis without smoking has further details.

Potential Benefits of Cannabis for Singers

Aside from the smoking issue, cannabis may actually have some benefits for avid singers. For example, cannabinoids like THC and CBD are well-known for their anti-inflammatory properties. Marijuana is also a muscle relaxant, and relaxing the throat and jaw are vital components of singing.

Therefore, although there is no research specifically on cannabis and singing, the herb could have some valuable properties.

To maximize the potential benefits of cannabis for singing, we recommend using either lozenges or syrup. You could also create your own soothing beverage by mixing a spoonful of cannabis honey with your favorite herbal tea.

Just remember that cannabis can cause dry mouth as a common side effect. Therefore, singers will want to keep plenty of warm or room-temperature water on hand to keep themselves hydrated.

Final Thoughts on Cannabis and Singing

Using cannabis and singing are both activities that many people love. Their vast popularity probably stems from the fact that they both influence the feel-good function of the endocannabinoid system. Both singing and cannabis can improve the mood and may have many additional benefits for health too.

The downside is that smoking marijuana is likely to have a negative impact on the voice. However, there are plenty of other viable consumption methods available. In fact, using cannabis without smoking could potentially help singers due to its relaxing and anti-inflammatory effects. We hope to see more evidence of this emerging soon.

Do you use marijuana and sing? How does it affect your voice? Let us know in the comments.